BEAgle considers any FAA examiner to be an idiot who should be shot at dawn ; )
If you'd bothered to read what I posted, I said that
SOME FAA examiners had been misinterpreting 'minimum loss of height' for 'no loss of height'. Hence the utter stupidity which has led to the requirement to reteach stalling. The information came directly from a senior American Boeing representative who clearly does understand.
No-one is suggesting that a
large pitch attitude change is needed to reduce AoA, just that a
sufficient attitude change is made. That will
not cause a massive RoD unless it is grossly mishandled.