I am confused. This looks like a pretty positive proposal to me. Are we sure we are not just looking for the worst here. It seems very good for an IMCr pilot like me who would like to fly to France in airways rather than as recently happened where I had to descend to 3000 ft to cross the channel because of a danger area notam for one day while going up would have busted an airway!
I would be happy to have the EIR while I train for the IR.
I hope this becomes law and the sooner the better, unless I am missing something. It sounds like the law makers have been listening and have come up with proposals that offer more than we currently have while still fitting in with ICAO.
It must be pretty demoralising to read this message board ( if they did) when they have tried to put together a proposal to move forward considerably from where we are right now.
Sorry i don't mean to upset anyone but it does seem there is a lot of negative comments so I thought I would add my positive ones!