flyingfiend, I should warn you, I love to play.
So, just for you -
I assume you have read what I posted.
I confess, I did skip through it a little bit. I think your postings are 'crappy' (to quote my own terminology) and not worth analysing in great detail. Also you seem to contradict your own method of reasoning, you expect cut and dry answers yet you yourself say 'I assume'. Are not assumptions something that are themselves considered risky in their context?
So, answere the question: Do you reject ALL legal decisions even those with which you agree?
I won't answer that question solely based on the fact that you are seeking an answer so as to self assure an already preconceived dermination in your mind. You won't get that satisfaction out of me by legal hound.
Any my my, very forceful and demanding in your line of questioning your honor!
I prefer to rely on evidence.
Better tell that one to those who are occasionally convicted and imprisoned even though a lack of evidence existed.