After all, you did say, in this very thread, that there is only one side to the Polar Air story.
Clinton,
You can do better than that, the only opinion I expressed was that the Polar Air case was more important to the industry.
However, as you have brought the matter up, my personal opinion is that the Polar Air case has a better foundation for the current action than our old mate Gerald.
Whether the courts see it that way is another matter altogether.
Will we see a trial of the substantive matter? Won't that rather depend on the outcome of the present application, and an appeal, if any, if the outcome is against Polar Air.
I await the decision on the present application with great interest.
Tootle pip!!