Originally Posted by
Lyman
BEA had their Pirate's opportunity to exonerate the airframer, which of course is not the case, in fact, or in evidence. They proclaim no new issues.
You use phrases like that and accuse *me* of bias?
You also mentioned "joining the dots" earlier, implying an effort to "exonerate" Airbus (even though, as I have said before they will have to carry at least some of the responsibility for the pitot problems), yet you provide no proof.
If there was an overspeed warning then the BEA would have mentioned it - there is absolutely no reason for them not to.
Sometimes a windmill is just a windmill.