To those who would comment on the saga of Repacholi VS CASA, perhaps it would be better if you studied the relevant cases involving Mr Repacholi and CASA, before forming opinions and making statements... because virtually all these case are laid out, on-line, for the public to see.
The evidence tendered, the statements of both plaintiff and defendant, the presiding judges summary (many of which are very revealing, as judges are largely very astute when it comes to summing up individual peoples personalities, and the persons value, as to reliability of evidence given)... and dozens of other highly relevant facts pertaining to cases, are presented in the precise form and manner that they were presented to the Court.
Notwithstanding that there are judges who have erred, and judges whose interpretations have been reversed in later appeals... the facts, summaries and judgements, as presented in these cases, are laid out for all to peruse and gain their own insight... and perhaps correct the views they might have previously held, that were gained by obtaining information that was far less reliable, than that presented to the Court, under our standard laws of admission of evidence.
AustLII Results - Gerald Repacholi