PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Haddon-Cave, Airworthiness, Sea King et al (merged)
Old 17th Sep 2011, 20:04
  #463 (permalink)  
Rigga
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Anglia
Posts: 2,076
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
In my opinion, it's the time that is taken "doing it right first time" that is the nub of this sideline discussion.

Whilst I fully endorse the need to follow design, development and testing processes in normal times; Nothing increases research and development for new technology like a War does.

The trouble with real UOR's is that they don't have that time for "proper" development and testing, certification or even precise installation - and this used to be the time when BDR techniques were used to install new systems or requirements (a-La Nimrod / Falkland AAR and Self-Defence Mods)

Too much time testing and the need is lost - may as well forget it.

Too little testing is also dangerous - but as Tourist implies "War is War" and the risk of reduced testing may be outweighed by the advantages of requirement's early use.

Just an opinion, not something I could put into practice.

And you are utterly correct about RAF engineering being lead by donkeys.

Last edited by Rigga; 17th Sep 2011 at 20:05. Reason: Immer wortbuauen
Rigga is offline