A320,
I notice you did not provide your reason for preferring the pressure to the radalt, just attacked some authors. You quote Pilots for 9/11 Truth: "What we do claim, is that the data provided by the NTSB does not support an impact. This is a factual statement, for either the NTSB decode, or Stutt's "additional" data."
This is only "factual" if you belief the pressure but reject the radalt. So I ask again why do you reject the radalt? There are no buildings near the impact point to interfere with radalt.