Water check, really? Seriously? It takes one sentence to dismiss and ignore that stuff you pasted. It's NOT an argument, just a bunch of nonsense and untruths and baloney. Don't you see how much you have been fooled if you actually rely upon such crap to support your position? Come on, man, think about it! Think! (Or, pick any paragraph and research it yourself in a real science book or ask a scientist at a university.)
Do you really think anyone with a properly functioning brain will respectfully read one sentence by Rich Deem, a truly pathetic and totally invalid source of non-knowledge, and consider any of it non-junk? Think, man! Think!
Every one of Deem's statements is dismissed by the educated and knowledgeable people who study and practice and teach science with only one motivation: Finding the scientific truth on which to base conclusions, without using a Bronze Age silly story book of god!
Making up fake terms or using fancy words to baffle and/or impress people only works on other fools! These words mean nothing in Christian arguments, though they do demonstrate the level of ignorance and idiocy involved.
And back to why Christians should not/cannot be debated:
False statements about science by inventing junk science are not evidence, and you cannot reason with someone who prefers fake junk scientific arguments over real science, and worse, one who actually considers fake, religiously-motivated, misunderstood, twisted junk science to be true.
Making up junk science does not alter or affect real science and its evidence.
Ignorant, nonsensical statements using invalid/fake/pretend science is not evidence. You simply cannot respond to or discuss science with people who display no knowledge of what real science is, and/or by their statements show they have a complete misunderstanding of science.
Feeding nonsense arguments filled with totally false, invalid, and pretend scientific points to gullible, ignorant, uneducated, superstitious believers in nonsense works wonders for gathering more cult members and money, but it does not impress anything upon those who understand science, other than pity toward the foolish writer.
Making up false and invalid arguments for which there is no more scientific debate, then using fake non-scientific arguments using fancy science terms to justify the position is simply laughable and embarrassing. Still, Christians continue this favourite tactic all the time, and it works on each other, but not with those who take the time to research real science, visit real museums, take real science classes and think for themselves.
Have a nice day!
Last edited by Iron Skillet; 13th Sep 2011 at 01:24.