Lyman, you may be in need of a "chill pill" again. Not only was there nothing in the "note" released prior to the 3rd interim report
I'm in disagreement with the release of this note
The BEA mission is not to make some "dummy interim report" in a note to the public (and press)
It's not the rule ...
They have not to answer to press articles (they answer the press in meetings)
If they are in disagreement with the press (lies .. defamation .. etc ..) the court of justice is available and is the place for such dispute
The release date of this note .. is at least suspicious .. and it's easy to link the dots
This note was a error of the BEA .. and this added nothing to their credit of transparency or independence