Minor point re: STALL WARNING. There was nothing whatever wrong with it, it functioned correctly. What failed happened later, and focusing on the lack of a Horn when one minute into LOC is like nibbling on the plastic garnish in your sushi.
Without comment, BEA does not address BUFFET. The entry into STALL was not 'conventional', and lacked a true break. That left the crew to rely on a System (SW) that was at best 50 percent dependable in the identified problem, (UAS)). That it was correct meant nothing to the crew, how were they to know?
PF was obsessed with Overspeed, and the ROD was not completely non-indicative of HS? The climb was similar in nature to an HSP ascent, and NOSE DOWN 'not responsive'?
Each time the guff gets to this point, someone needs to remind us of the conditions, the failures, and the not well understood UAS problems.
Not even BEA has condemned the crew as yet. Have they cynically relied on the public to convict?