Hi DozyWannabe,
Thanks for the reply - I think we are talking at crossed tortoises.
Quote:
Me.... Please explain how you think it is possible for a heavy aircraft to be airborne, yet travel through the air with a speed <60 kts.
You .... and I think that's probably why the systems were designed the way they were - for the very reason that it is so unlikely.
Do we agree that it is impossible for a passenger airliner to be at FL 350 with an airflow <60kts passing over the Alpha probes (from whatever direction)?
The A330 stall warning logic has an error (similar to the B744 slat retract & hence stall warning on take off, which I mentioned earlier). The 744's stowing the inboard leading edge devices due to a spurious REV signal when airborne, should also have had on ground logic to prevent it.
And ironically that was due to a software logic error in the 744's systems that had never reared its head until that moment.
AB stall warning inhibit below 60Kt should apply only on the ground.