PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - AF 447 Thread No. 6
View Single Post
Old 28th August 2011 | 03:01
  #543 (permalink)  
DozyWannabe
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,093
Likes: 0
From: UK
Originally Posted by JD-EE
What do the pilots know that the computers don't already know? In fact everything the pilots see is filtered by computers. The AF447 pilots were just as blind and bereft of real data as the pilots.
Whoa there, milady! For a start, the FMC/FCUs do not have a different set of reactions programmed based on the time of day for a given location. The specifications were laid down on the understanding that during daylight hours, the pilots have an outside visual reference that the computers not only do not have, but cannot comprehend. The design assumptions also factored in that the computers cannot match the human ability to problem-solve and compensate for situational changes in real-time.

What this boils down to is that in night-time IMC, the human pilots have less of an advantage over the computers than they do in daylight hours in terms of perception, but again, the human ability to problem solve "on the fly" is still better than that of any computer system of the vintage used in modern airliners - as a reminder :

Code:
Aircraft   Computer  Chip      H/W Development  S/W Development
--------    --------   -----      ---------------   --------------- 
 A320:      ELAC      Motorola  Thompson-CSF     Thompson-CSF 
                      68000 

           SEC       Intel     SFENA            Aerospatiale
                      80186                       Atelier Logiciel
 A3[3/4]0:      FCPC      Intel     Aerospatiale     Aerospatiale
                      80386     ADL              Atelier Logiciel

           FCSC      Intel     Sextant          Aerospatiale 
                      80186     Avionique        Atelier Logiciel
Yes the computers have raw AoA information, which right now the pilots do not (this may change). However, I believe there are still too many variables in play to build the kind of system you're suggesting using the available technology and still get it into a certifiable state.

Fundamentally, while I understand your desire to engineer a way out of this situation, I think following that path is well-intentioned, but misguided. History has shown that nature (and the human psyche in particular) can outwit the best efforts of engineers almost every time.
DozyWannabe is offline