Originally Posted by
jcjeant
In fact the BEA explanations shown some things .. the complete failure of the BEA to conduct professionally a search for a disappeared plane (for this particular plane at least)
I take it then that you are an expert professional in underwater searches in the Mid-Atlantic (3000m depth plus), to profess such a judgment.
Do you work for Wood Hole? If not, why didn't you offer your services?
And I even suppose you don't know the expression "needle in haystack".....
By the BEA failure in researches a precious time was lost for publish new recommendations
Slightly dumb remark.... Some recommendations HAVE already been published, and so far I haven't seen any crashes similar to AF447. What "precious time" was lost?
The BEA explanations are not satisfactory...
Maybe not to you, since they don't match your conspiracy theories.
I doubt you've ever been part of a real accident investigation.