Originally Posted by
Lyman
Who is to say, that at 4 degrees AoA, just because the STALL warn returns, there isn't a full on recovery in process?
Where did you find those 4° AoA? During the whole stall, the AoA remained above 30°...
Originally Posted by
Lyman
The secret is to exchange vertical for horizontal velocity, and a dive is not required, (Standard recovery from STALL). A dive makes things impossible.
"Fly Through with POWER"....AIRBUS)
No. No. Definitely no.
When stalled, diving is
required, unless you got enough power (thrust) to counteract your aircraft weight
and drag @ high AoA, which is
NOT the case of any airliner.
The standart recovery from stall is to dive, to trade altitude (which must be a secondary concern, then) to a lesser (and flyable) AoA.
Originally Posted by
Lyman
Oh, and "NOT STALLED". I left out the pinc , majrks, Of course, a Stall, but "What a pilot believes is reality," not STALL/ sorry
Unfortunately, when pilots believe something that is not really reality, eventually planes crash...
"situation awareness" ; rings any bell?
Originally Posted by
Lyman
AZR Also, (forgetful) I am not meaning the 'g' demand LAW, but 'g' PROTECTION as the problem.
Argh.
Once again, the purpose of the 'g' PROTECTION is to protect the aircraft structural integrity. Unless you imply that structural failures (like: loosing a wing or two, in the worst cases) are better...
