Originally Posted by
Lyman
"As long as I keep the Nose UP, she won't STALL."
May I ask how you would stall voluntary an aircraft, then??
Originally Posted by
Lyman
Not once did the airframe experience the only true symptom of actual STALL that he could have related to. NOSE Plummet. lose your lunch, point at the deck NOSE drop.
No nose plummet indeed, partly or totally due to the THS position.
But that wasn't the "only true symptom of actual STALL". I'm sure you have heard about buffeting? And read about actual buffeting in AF447, per the DFDR data analysis?
Honestly, it's becoming annoying to have the impression that you select/distord facts in order to fit them in a theory. Apologies if it's not what you're seeking, but that's the impression it gaves (me).
To criticize every possible bit of the aircraft/features, and remove every possible bit of the crew responsability won't help prevent future accidents, you know...
Originally Posted by
Lyman
In fact, again, technically, she was NOT.
She was not what? Not stalled?
How would you describe it, then?