Originally Posted by airtren
Have you read the BEA Report? Its analysis and CVR transcript are quite clear. Isn't that a enough "real base" for you?If you read the BEA Report it states clearly that the PF and PNF had no Stall Approach, or Stall at High altitude training.
Is that enough?
I did read. And I don't know what you are exactly referring to. I was just expressing my doubts that a pilot, who is able to completely ignore a continuous stall warning for nearly one minute, even applies full aft stick during this alarm, suddenly (during the faulty intermittent stall warning later) not only regards stall warning again, but also adopts by 'instant learning' to do exactly the opposite to what he has ever been taught before.( see your own post:
http://www.pprune.org/tech-log/45687...ml#post6621429 ). It's simply my view on that, nothing more.
So, no 'high altitude' approch to stall / stall training? The 'ordinary' approach to stall training would have done: nose down. No difference at high altitude.