^^^maybe I'm lacking in understanding but how in the world could someone be sued or criminally convicted based on stolen evidence ? If someone were to break into your house, steal information and then publish it what criminal court would allow this to be admitted as evidence ? Or if an individual were to walk into someone's office, rifle through their desk, and take information and release it what court would allow this to be admitted ? It seems to me at least one criminal act was committed by the one who stole and released the photos--AND how could stolen photos have unquestionable credibility ?
Sad situation for everyone and judgment lacking everywhere. THIS guy seems to have gotten away with it (AND gave us the autopilot to boot):
About MHC: Founding Member
Anyway goes to show that in low judgment situations pilots, scorned women, and cameras can be a very bad combination. Hopefully what is left of this sticky situation will blow over.