Originally Posted by A33Zab
-The AOA replacement program was already in progress before publication of the 3rd BEA report.
-They did found the cause: 'machine oil residu left after the fabrication process' and so they know the solution too.
-There was no relationship whatsoever with this case.
That
an AoA replacement program was already in progress is one thing, that AoA 1 on AF447 was stuck at 2.1 deg is another.
It may be your call to state that there was 'no relationship whatsoever', I may think differently, but it is BEA duty to touch the subject in a
third Interim Report.
1-
HN39 had already
pondered one of your
previous post :
Originally Posted by A33Zab
so AOA#1 could be effected, however didn't had any influence.
FCPC using median AOA (or outvoted AOA#1), AoAsw using highest AOA value.
2- There is no such thing as a "FCPC outvote an AoA"
If one AoA sensor is stuck, there is a possibility that its own ADR
anemometric value will be rejected.
Now, remember that in the meantime, was taking place an ADR anemometric values rejection process based on
pitot unreliable informations.
So, we end up with a very complex situation, maybe unknown territories ...
I can see too much insistance from
BEA,
media,
people here around to put everything on the pilots back, when in the meantime, FDR data analysis is kept to a
strict minimum.
Those FDR data are too serious to be left in the BEA and Airbus hands only.
Victim's families must obtain them too. Alternatives ressources for Analysis are available on this planet Earth.