@DW
the inhibition of Stall Warning at 60kts and below had no causative effect on this accident, because by the time the aircraft had reached this point it was already too late.
I have not held in any post in this thread that the stall warning caused this accident. I have held that (1) the logic of the stall warning system is flawed (2) that this accident
illustrates the nature of those flaws (3) that these flaws are one
possible explanation for the pilots behavior doing one specific phase of the accident (4) that the professionals who designed the system should be held accountable for those flaws to the extent they played any role in this accident (a point which I believe has yet to be conclusively determined because the final report is not out yet).
That is all I have held and anyone who asserts anything else fails at reading comprehension.