Bearfoil,
I am going to do my best to answer, as I can't fully parse your post, and am guessing that my post have have been unclear, and thus difficult to understood.
My post was only referring to the fact that the PF's action on the SS could have had a good reason to have a NU component, due to the context of the pitch/roll/power state of the plane left to him immediately after the AP disconnect.
That as opposed to those that are the opinion that there was no reason for a NU action..
As far as the AF 447 accident, I mentioned several times that IMO, there are multiple confluent causes, which the "pitot tubes" are only a part of, in one category, and part of multiple classes in that category. The category is "a/c components failure".
Originally Posted by
bearfoil
airtren
Would you consider other than Pitot issues as cause? That would involve other than a "time interval" approach? The A/P is 'dynamic' (constant) in its inputs, No? So the disconnect is "instant", not sequential? The important vector is the 'logic' of its loss? Not the "cause"?
So also the discussion involves a possible "remnant" of NORMAL LAW? Unfortunately, this introduces "mode Confusion".