I am flattered you seem so intrigued by my possible bias. My bias is in opposition to:
Lack of complete disclosure, something I anticipate; for now, no harm no foul.
Cossetted product: "show your work"......
An anal retention of data, for as yet "historically ill-defined purpose"...
Secrecy, which implies a mistrust: of the Public, the industry, or themselves.
Evidently, an anti-mission "blunder", (the note) that was used by the public to assign blame, via urban myth, counter to BEA's charge not to assign it.
This "blame by public proxy" is despicable, not a mistake, and advantages a Party to lawsuit and potential criminal prosecution. As such, it is anti social, and anti democratic.
I am all too aware of the standard issue "support structure" in rapt attendance to an authority that has methods that are outdated, parochial, and serve not the best interest of the Public Safety.
Denial is not a river in Egypt.
what are your thoughts?
aside: As to: MLA. Airbus would not exempt the final protection (load) simply because of a faux CAS. Give credit where due.