Speedy,
“it would actually mean 25% of 15% of 25% which equals a massive (not) saving of 0.9%.”
Wow, interesting math’s. But for the sake of argument, lets use your 0.9% cost savings. Are you aware that this would be an annual saving to the business of about 40m. Do you think this is insignificant? What does 40m per annum more buy QF that can’t be provided by a cockpit crew on market rates?
But lets assume that the sky caves in and QF achieves the labor cost savings they are seeking by basing crews “offshore”.
As pointed out by BB, these crews must be Australian’s holding Australian licenses flying VH registered aircraft.
So why does this constitute “chucking away 90 years of piloting experience”. Why do you assume that the pilots employed in these bases wont bring with them “90 years of experience” too. Just because they don’t wear a QF uniform doesn’t mean they are new to the game.
“lowering standards will also increase the risks of very expensive accidents and incidents….”
Again, what makes you think standards will be lower in these bases? All Australian licensed pilot’s work to a standard defined by the Australian regulator. If this does not apply to “offshored” crew then you have a regulation issue. I suggest you lobby your local member to correct this.
“Just being a devils advocate...why would the planed have to be registered in Oz?”
Does QF have the facility on their AOC for non oz registered aircraft?