Originally Posted by
bearfoil
When it comes to actual BEA data "PF input RLNU.....at PITCH +10 the a/c began to climb", the immediate response is the PF commanded an absurd ascent which led to the loss of a/c. Various adjectives are selected out of thin air to savage his training, and hold in suspicion his competence.
I find that outrageous. Is there another way to see these slanders here?
Bear, I honestly don't see that being either implied or said outright anywhere - in fact the only person to say words to that effect throughout the running threads has been you!
Even elite pilots make mistakes - sometimes fatal ones. *If* the PF in this case made a mistake, then there may have been extenuating circumstances. *If* his training was part of the cause through being substandard, then it must be corrected. This is not about blame or slander, it's about trying to make sure that it doesn't happen again.