PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Phraseology Question - Omit "To" and "For"?
Thread: Phraseology Question - Omit "To" and "For"?
View Single Post
Old 19th July 2011 | 13:26
  #14 (permalink)  
low n' slow
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
From: Scandiland
I omit "to" and "for". Doing so reduces the number of words in the readback. All headings and FL clearances are "fly to" instructions, never "fly from". Hence there's no point in stating the obvious...

Whenever numbers are said on the radio I'm very careful to use the appropriate prefix such as "heading", "altitude", "FL" or callsign. Just saying the numbers I find very unprofessional such as: cleared 180, 270, 551.

/LnS
low n' slow is offline  
Reply
0