Hi Graybeard,
Originally Posted by Graybeard
I hope BEA explains how the cg moved from the automatic 38% MAC, as shown above, and in the initial report, to 29% (or was it 23?) in its latest report.
They say 29%. Either a typo, either it means that the aircraft was loaded with a heavy nose, hence, target CG could not be moved aft, even with a fully loaded THS.