A person is objective if they are swayed by facts, and not personal feelings or opinions.
Neither you nor BB can therefor be described as 'objective'.
The 'facts' of this case speak for themselves. No determination of cause is possible. So say numerous independent reviews of the available evidence, and of course now, so also says the Ministry of Defence.
Long after we are all dust, the record will show where the available evidence led.
There is total agreement.
All you gum bumpers can have whatever 'opinion' you wish. As we all now agree, they simply cannot be supported by the available facts, and so are of little value .
And relax.
