PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - AF 447 Thread No. 5
View Single Post
Old 15th Jul 2011, 22:45
  #351 (permalink)  
takata
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Paris
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by HN39
I do not agree with "All the paragraphe above is quoting the FCOM's explanation" because the explanations contain a number of details that are specific to this incident.
Please, explain which part (words) of the paragraphe before the sentence "Pour terminer,..." is related to this specific incident?
I really can't see anything related to current flight and I'm struggling to understand what is confusing about this way of reviewing every system protection that were not available for ACA. My reading is 100% clear.
takata is offline