Anyone who writes comments such as:
(John Day)'s arguments seem well reasoned and logical, after all, the aircraft was flown at high speed into a cliff. It is perhaps understandable, in view of the loss of lives, that he chose to step beyond the confines of the 'rules'.
and
Unfortunately the circumstancial evidence is damming (sic), the board may have been constrained by the rules the senior officers weren't.
or
You may succeed with your obsessional campaign but ultimately the existing judgement on these pilots will be seen as reasonable by their peers, and they themselves may well agree.
would appear to have very unusual belief that Wratten and Day were bound by no rules. Furthermore, courtney, it is
you who appears to have an irrational desire to damn the two pilots.
Anyway, justice has now finally been delivered. Your facile "That's as may be, but I know better" comments have no place on this thread.
I note that neither cazatou nor Sir.... 'John Purdey' has deigned to offer a comment on the result.....