Hello Garage Years. Script is an unfortunate term. It infers a drama, a fiction, something crafted from whole cloth by someone to gain interest or commercial advantage. Wait..........wasn't AB pleased to trumpet it?
It is simply not possible to know where the NU part of RL derived. In not giving up some data, by way of explanation, BEA have encouraged a result not in evidence. Or, it could be treated as you did, absence of evidence is evidence of absence. I choose to assume the input was correct as stated, and derived as one would who had some confidence in the PF. You choose another way, variety is the spice of........
Take your pick, both are conjecture. Do you not see this? OR, in seeing it, do you choose to ignore/deny it?
Can you try playing the Ball, and not the Player? Your emoticons are starting to fade from exposure to the ether.