Hi Turbine,
Originally Posted by Turbine D
So far this thread plus the previous four total 9677 posts and counting. Apparently, questioning, probing and trying to understand technical and engineering "stuff", as you put it, regarding the aircraft and its FBW controls seems to be not the thing to do in your mind. The conclusion seemingly has been reached by you, ergonomics and interface issues were the cause, end of discussion.
Certainly not. Discussing systems and engineering "stuff" is very fine with my bandwith allocation. What I'm very less interested is about such fallacious and circular argumentations based on nothing but greviances, which discards investigation work in order to insert some supposed hidden informations, revealing the cover up of imaginatory supposed "facts".
I'll give you an example:
Bearfoil's point is that the aircraft attitude at AP disconnection was in some abnormal attitude (pitched down below -13°) and slow, but fast - such fact, of course is hidden by the BEA - then UAS was immediately due to "turbulent airflow" while she zoomed 3000 ft due to crazy THS systems triming her to the max because of some nose down roll tendency, but Pilots fought the roll and nose up pitch, but were few seconds later back to 3NU which was now increasing to 13NU while applying full back stick during half a minute, and so on...
Here, let me tell you that it is in fact a huge waste of bandwith, in my book.