Originally Posted by
bearfoil
takata, you are wishful thinking. I know the feeling, and you have it.
Pot, meet kettle.
Seriously - takata's going on the evidence we have so far and you're still working on the supposition that the aircraft must have done something on it's own despite everything that we've been told - because, as you said before, you don't want to believe that the PF made a basic error and then compounded it.
We don't have anywhere enough information to make a call yet, but if you expect us to take your input seriously then you must also equally consider the possibility that - aside from the pitot issue - there was nothing wrong with the aircraft and that the upset was pilot-induced.