I've read a few selected documents. Absolutely gobsmacked that, for example, they got the definition of the process that maintains the Safety Case 100% wrong, not even mentioning "Safety Case". As that was the headline failure noted by Haddon-Cave, you'd think they'd make the effort to get that one right. They compound matters by omitting the safety net whereby the necessary funding is (was) ring-fenced; but now it can just be used by anyone at the expense of safety (again, as reported by Haddon-Cave). That is like leaving Orville and Wilbur out of the history of aviation. I just gave up.
