PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Decision to axe Harrier is "bonkers".
View Single Post
Old 10th Jul 2011, 18:19
  #927 (permalink)  
FODPlod
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: The sunny South
Posts: 819
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Capt P U G Wash

So from this I deduce:


Since Apache and Ocean are performing a Carrier Strike role and having a significant impact, we don’t need anything bigger, better or more expensive.

The Apache makes better targeting decisions than Harrier, lucky we kept Tornado then.

The RN’s ambition for a strike capability is limited to that of a pair of Apaches, is this a man we should trust with handling our future major strike capability?
Sherlock - As sea-based Apaches and Harriers and land-based Tornados all have distinct but complementary merits which are not mutually exclusive, the Admiral makes perfect sense so the answer to your question is "Yes".
FODPlod is offline