PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - FAA NEW RULE 180 minute for multiple engines
Old 9th Jul 2011, 01:31
  #33 (permalink)  
galaxy flyer
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Where the Quaboag River flows, USA
Age: 71
Posts: 3,416
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
avgenie

Quads have to flight plan accounting for depressurization at the ETP, so it shouldn't be an issue. I agree ETOPS has, and will, improve reliability and safety for quads--better fire suppression, ETOPS=qualified engines and accessories, avionics cooling, etc. But, since twins HAVE to land at the nearest suitable airport in the event of engine failure, why are we extending that restriction to quads? They have demonstrated many times, that if planned correctly, can safety continue after an engine failure to the destination or a better alternate, esp. on trans-polar, trans-Siberian, and some oceanic routes.

GF
galaxy flyer is offline