PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - FAA NEW RULE 180 minute for multiple engines
Old 9th July 2011 | 01:31
  #33 (permalink)  
galaxy flyer
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2002
: ATP+Mil
Posts: 3,982
Likes: 566
From: Where the Quaboag River flows, USA
avgenie

Quads have to flight plan accounting for depressurization at the ETP, so it shouldn't be an issue. I agree ETOPS has, and will, improve reliability and safety for quads--better fire suppression, ETOPS=qualified engines and accessories, avionics cooling, etc. But, since twins HAVE to land at the nearest suitable airport in the event of engine failure, why are we extending that restriction to quads? They have demonstrated many times, that if planned correctly, can safety continue after an engine failure to the destination or a better alternate, esp. on trans-polar, trans-Siberian, and some oceanic routes.

GF
galaxy flyer is offline  
Reply