The conflict concerning 61.75 etc is fairly obvious when you see things like
this written. Old history, but this is old history being discussed here too.
Difficult to put a finger on this, but I do think UK AOPA needs fresh and more dynamic leadership. I have met the present leadership on a number of occassions at various events around Europe and each time it was sitting there, comfortably, eyes more or less closed and in one case gently snoring, apparently after a very good lunch.
In some instances a clear opportunity to question some proposal was missed. I recall two events, both involving very damaging Eurocontrol proposals, when no questions were fielded, presumably because it was shortly after lunch. Both were mega opportunities to question policy and do so openly. We all know the Euro regulators absolutely hate any kind of open discussion; it sets them back months because of the ridicule attracted.
Now, obviously, I have no idea of what great work goes on behind the scenes, and maybe the leadership really is highly effective, but it isn't readily apparent.
UK AOPA have historically been unwilling to work with PPL/IR, which is not good because a lot of unwanted regulation is proposed and implemented from the top and then works its way down the GA food chain. 8.33 is one example.
And, as this thread shows, and from many I know personally, there is a lot of historical baggage which prevents great many pilots joining.
So it may be time for someone new who can present a new dynamic face, and enable a break with the past which alone might open new doors.