Originally Posted by
syseng68k
Not smart enough by half, in that an appropriate function would, for example, recognise things like pf commanding a zoom climb or other sequence of events outside the expected operating conditions at a given stage of flight and at least provoke the suggestion that it is perhaps not a good idea.
Like a stall warning perhaps?
I'm not arguing for more or less automation, but more intelligence in terms of trend analysis, resolution of ambiguous situations and timely warnings where operation is tending towards potentially dangerous situations.
From the Evidence (fact)
- At 2 h 10 min 51, the stall warning was triggered again........
The aircraft appeared to do exactly the sort of thing you are saying it should.
There isn't a lot of evidence, but what there is is quite powerful stuff.