Glad Rag,
I'm trying not to 'debate' what is in all probability a closed issue. I just don't think that myth should replace fact.
I could prove the SHAR/GR9 issue if you wanted, but over PMs if you wish. No fur on this one.
Yes, the RN signed up to losing SHAR - as I said, big error in my view. My info is that as far as SDSR went, canning Harrier was a late (very late) reversal of previous discussions, which was presented to 1SL as a PM decision following personal intervention from CDS.
The common thread here is that commitments made by the RAF to support a 'Joint' initiative (maritime strike capability) have twice been cast aside as soon as tough decisions were required. Having worked with the RAF for some time, I'm not surprised that Tornadoes and Typhoons would always take the budgets when it came to the crunch. And I fully agree that the RAF has had to eat its fair share of the nasty sandwich.
Happy to rest here, Best Regards as ever,
Engines