PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - AF 447 Thread no. 4
View Single Post
Old 2nd July 2011 | 13:36
  #645 (permalink)  
RR_NDB
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 876
Likes: 0
From: Nearby SBBR and SDAM
Adequate redundancy (always under K.I.S.S. constraints)

A33Zab, the point is: We must consider in the System design (a/c+crew operation) everything to avoid going straight from "Normal Law" to "Murphy´s Law"

And remember, i am against the (ridiculous) redundancy (wrongly applied) when critical System elements are prone to fail simultaneously. Your examples doesn´t fit in this category. And even if this occur, you can save the day in most of cases. (Looking to your question, BA 38 and FLT 1549 came to my mind)

PA 18 151 mostly in here and here

Last edited by RR_NDB; 2nd July 2011 at 13:52.
RR_NDB is offline