Hi,
To me, the AoA response makes complete sense as a pilot of the Airbus. What has not been either appreciated or grasped by many, is, from the beginning, this design has required a different way of thinking, a different approach to training, to flying, to anticipating behaviour and to interacting with the machine, and it absolutely requires a positive attitude and approach towards it. If one is forever either fearful or hostile or otherwise actively diffident towards the design and the airplane, like prejudice itself, no amount of discussion, facts, knowledge or perhaps even actual engagement and understanding, is going to change one's mind. And that too, is a human factor.
PJ2
So .. we return to starting blocks ... again
If you know that (
a different approach to training) ... why (it's seem's by all I read here from professionals) .. that the training is qualified as "low" at AF and certain other companies
?
If you know that a different approach is needed .. certainly Airbus and consequently .. companies know that.
Why .. after sooo many years .. some voices for more training and revised procedures .. ?
Who was blind or negligent ?