PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Merged: Senate Inquiry
View Single Post
Old 25th Jun 2011, 00:59
  #1201 (permalink)  
Jetsbest
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Going nowhere...
Posts: 344
Received 25 Likes on 4 Posts
Lester, I disagree...

BB is on the record implying that putting a 'properly trained' cadet straight into the right seat of 'high-capacity' rpt is better than other, worthless, experience. My point is that a prior-experienced pilot can and should also be trained properly into any airline, in which case the prior experience (even running a store in the Bungle Bungles to continue your corporate analogy) has to be worth more than none!
The Senate Inquiry spent months getting the views of stakeholders and summarising the input into important recommendations intended to improve standards in the aviation industry.

BB evidently believes he knows better, and that his opinion should be more important than everyone else who have FAR more long term experience (there's that word again) observing the aviation industry. I call that arrogant!

Last edited by Jetsbest; 25th Jun 2011 at 10:02. Reason: typos...
Jetsbest is offline