PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Rising toll blamed on Macho pilots
View Single Post
Old 6th Oct 2002, 12:24
  #3 (permalink)  
Rich-Fine-Green
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Under the Equator
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Was faxed a copy this afternoon from Banana Land.

Quite a sensationalist story for the Sunday morning breakfast table.

Some observations after skimming the copy for the first time;

1. Bills comments as Vice-president of AOPA are interesting considering that a vocal group within that organisation actually want PPL's to be able to hold Instructor Ratings!.

2. A number of the 'Fatal Crashes' listed are Ultralight/Gyrocopter/Homebuilt/Aerobatic and although equally tragic, really should not be listed as part of this article. Although the numbers involved are not great - it does add to the overall impact of the story.

3. Doug Edward's comments about a 'macho element' (unless he was 'mis-quoted') is demeaning to the professionalism in the Australian G.A. industry of the vast majority of high & low time pilots. Questionable judgement in some cases - yes, but 'Macho'?.

I would consider Qld's accident rate to be more along the lines of what Peter Gibson said; large distances and higher number of flights.

However, I do also agree that the training standards could do with a review. The change from a 180 hour CPL to 150 hour CPL was a mistake as the 'Integrated' course is abused by a lot of part time students as well as 3 year university students. The spirit of the 150 hour integrated course is as a full time course. More scrutiny or better clarification of the 150 hour course would see part-time students and Uni course students complete the 200 hour syllabus instead.
Rich-Fine-Green is offline