and the Stall warning which would not have occurred in Normal Law (as observed by HN39).
Furthermore it is noteworthy, since stall warning and stall do not occur in normal law, that the master PRIM was functioning in Alternate (2) law.
It is my understanding that a "Stall Warning"
can occur in Normal Law i.e. it is not "inhibited". It should not be triggered, since the high Alpha protections should keep Alpha short of it, but should they not be able to, then the Stall Warning will occur (as it did in Perpignon).
i.e. I don't think one can read that a "Stall Warning" = "Not in Normal Law". One can read that for a "Stall Warning" (at least) one AoA probe is seeing an AoA that should not be achiveable if Normal Law is functioning and able to control AoA.