Originally Posted by
walter kennedy
SFFP
The proof is the interpretation of the available data which I could not get smaller than an 80+ page report and supporting illustrating video lasting 50+ minutes - if you go through my posts you may see how several particular points are justified - otherwise you may have to wait for the public release of the report (after inquiry has finished).
So in summation, apart from your theory, you have not got a single substantiated fact to help prove what you assert. Not one written or verbal fact to back your story up, nothing what so ever
Surely after all these years of you contributing in here someone must have come forward with the smoking gun that proves you correct, surely