Hi,
. 101a. The crew possessed the licenses and ratings required to undertake the flight;
. 102a. The airplane possessed a valid Certificate of Airworthiness, and had been maintained in accordance with the regulations;
. 103a. The airplane had taken off from Rio de Janeiro without any known technical problems, except on one of the three radio management panels;
. 104c. The composition of the crew was in accordance with the operator’s procedures;
. 105c. At the time of the event, the weight and balance of the airplane were within the operational limits;
. 106c. At the time of the event, the two co-pilots were seated in the cockpit and the Captain was resting;
. 107c. The Captain returned to the cockpit about 1 min 30 after the disengagement of the autopilot.
Never writed the contrary
Just writed (also in the BEA report) that the pilot aged 32 years not detained a ATPL
The question is
If AF allow a not ATPL pilot to be PF when captain is not in the fligtdeck