They just say you have to be "legal", which leaves them with all the options, which is exactly how they want it.
That is not necessarily true. For example, when an insurance broker is faced with losing some nice hull, 3rd party and pilot insurance premiums in the amount of say, £ 5000 or even £ 10000 per annum (I wish I had that shiny armour), it might be worthwile to negotiate with them. It is the insurance contract that counts, not whether the activity is legal.
For example, I know of insurance companies that offer employer's insurance for "domestic staff", even when there is no contract and everything is paid under the table. At the end of the day, the letter of the contract stands, unless the contract is made explicitly void by law. So the contract is the place to look for license requirements, brown underwear and the slaughtered goat in the back.
Undoubtedly many insurance companies will lose out if this terrrible legislative proposal were to make it past the EP Transport Committee. Are Aviabel / BNP Paribas / Global Aerospace / Hayward Aviation etc... aware of what the Neazis are up to ?
Not a bad idea to call your insurance company now and ask them what their stance is going to be and if they don't like what's coming, would they mind informing the transport minister of their thoughts etc...
Meanwhile, back in Belgium :
Aerials : Someone just told me that the Transport Minister to contact is Theresa Villiers, as opposed to Philip Hammond, but you get the jest of it.