PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - AF 447 Thread no. 4
View Single Post
Old 15th Jun 2011, 20:21
  #12 (permalink)  
jcjeant
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Germany
Age: 67
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Hi,

Last OT on this sensible matter

@jcjeant : I pretty much answered the same question here:

AF447 Thread No. 3

You only need to see the continuing resentment from some quarters to see that the controversies of 1988 did them little good.
If BEA allowed AB to say that, after reviewing the data, no modifications to the A330 are needed, that would imply to most people that the accident was caused by pilot error; right?

If BEA intended to avoid making any conclusions in the last preliminary communications, they should not have allowed AB to make any statements since people now believe that BEA must also think that no a/c modifications are necessary.
We must keep in mind that all press releases and BEA release are mainly read by the general public and not only by the Pprune contributors ...
General public don't go on all kind of deep analyses on such press articles or BEA note ...
With only a few words and explanations .. they form their own opinion
Public sentiment in general by reading the note and press articles can't be ambiguous .. the way is clear ...
jcjeant is offline