In order to effectively deploy assets under this system, it is essential to have a national dispatch function. Under the NPAS, this centre would receive requests for an aircraft and the nearest aircraft available would be deployed.
Once dispatched the aircraft would then fall under the command and control of the local force command and control centre, allowing local management of the incident in a similar manner as is currently used.
That is what worries me the most - WHO SAYS that it is "essential" to have a National Dispatch
function ?
Would it not be better to have a LOCAL dispatch "function" -
to benefit from the EFFICIENCY of a Police Officer needing Air Support requesting it
directly from the Air Support Unit who are best placed to assess viability and respond IMMEDIATELY when required,
but maybe with a National MONITORING function - for flight following,
and with the ability to suggest deployment of alternative aircraft when they are aware it might be more appropriate to do so ?
The problem is (still) that Police Auhorities are being fed stories by NPAS harping on
about how their plan will save money AND make the exisitng Air Support Units more efficient and effective,
but I'd bet they have NOT been told that in REALITY, the move to a National Control Room ( function ),
has the potential to make the service a lot LESS efficient,
with no guarantee that there will be any cost saving at all if the same level of service is to be provided.
