Doze
Hey. Re:
"...But bear, as yet there's no evidence of a "wall of misunderstanding" in this accident because we don't have all the facts, yet you and many others (barely any of whom are current Airbus pilots) are pronouncing it as if you have the facts in your hands rather than simply regurgitating prejudice..."
Hmmm. "...to 13 degrees nose up, and remained in that position to impact..." (reference the THS via BEA note to Public.)
Perhaps then just a minor mistake? Someone did not get the a/c that "did everything it was supposed to do".. I call that evidence of a "Wall". If PF did not take note of the "THS MAN PITCH ONLY", I like to think that is a major misunderstanding. Why does the a/c "TRIM" outside NORMAL LAW?
Seems if the a/c was in need of emphatic inputs, perhaps "quickly needed" and in opposition to eachother, why invogorate a system that s l o w l y reacts with a gargantuan control surface, with immense authority, and likely to get in the way of assertive handling?
just a thought