Henra,
Please let's discuss it on what is known or reasonable to assume and not some blunt generalisations or completely unfounded wild speculation. Let's leave this to the media....
Thanks for your latitude. The point I am making (badly) is that it simply is not possible to determine any cause from the report that was relased by BEA. There are too many missing facts, ambiguous sequences and vauge quantifications. Additional evidence that it is not possible, is the hundreds of pages of posts that are no nearer to agreeing an interpretation of the report, never mind the actual causal factors.
If my point is even partially correct, just what was the point of this report update?